![Skype updates](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/93.jpg)
![pentagon alien news pentagon alien news](https://static.politico.com/48/5b/d65bb4c04e6693d4595a7a846d59/0430pentagon.jpg)
The UFO report that prompted her plan does not support this claim. “Our national security efforts rely on aerial supremacy and these phenomena present a challenge to our dominance over the air,” she said. Indeed, on December 9, Gillibrand put out a press statement asserting that UFOs are threatening American military control of the skies. ĭespite that lack of evidence, the very argument that ODNI could not support was exactly the one Gillibrand used to celebrate her UFO office plan. “We currently lack data to indicate any UAP are part of a foreign collection program or indicative of a major technological advancement by a potential adversary,” the report wrote. They just don’t have much in the way of proof. Previous government UFO investigations turned up no evidence of a national security threat, but this year’s ODNI report changed the equation by asserting that UFOs pose a flight safety risk (mostly due to pilots becoming distracted) and concluding that if UFOs represent advanced technology from a foreign adversary, then they would be a national security risk. What remains missing in the discussion is evidence. Gillibrand has a laundry list of concerns, from the potential national security threat of advanced adversarial technology to the need to give military pilots “a voice” that she believes has been silenced by ridicule. Joking aside, senators like Gillibrand, Marco Rubio, and Roy Blunt have long claimed that the UFO issue is serious, though their reasoning tends to slide around, the more you probe. That doesn’t justify leaping to conclusions about superhuman technology or alien invasion, particularly when reasonable explanations have been proposed for nearly all the allegedly incredible sightings.
![pentagon alien news pentagon alien news](https://pyxis.nymag.com/v1/imgs/28a/e3d/5a89f18e9ca05a50f114cf8322b5460baf-ufo--.rsquare.w700.jpg)
Investigating individual military sightings should be encouraged uncovering whether some of these perhaps represent adversaries’ efforts to spy on America should be an obvious counterintelligence step. So-called “unidentified aerial phenomena,” as the government now calls UFOs, are likely a combination of natural and human-made objects along with a strong dash of people misinterpreting what they see under the influence of more than a century of alien-themed science fiction. It’s also quite likely that there is no single explanation for these oddities.
![pentagon alien news pentagon alien news](https://www.the-sun.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/6/2020/12/ad-ufo-x-files-1.jpg)
It’s beyond doubt that people see strange things in the sky. Like, imaginary crashed-saucer wreckage weird. Underneath the surface, Congress is about to require the Pentagon to get weird. At least that’s the aspect of this decision on which the legislators who pushed for the new office want the public to focus.
![pentagon alien news pentagon alien news](https://staticr1.blastingcdn.com/media/photogallery/2019/5/23/os/b_1200x630/daily-mail-reports-the-investigation-undertaken-by-the-pentagon-related-to-mysterious-and-unexplained-aircraft-blasting-new-database_2268449.jpg)
The new office will gather reports of sightings, analyze them, and deliver reports to Congress on the subject at intervals. Six months after the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, or ODNI, delivered a report to Congress that failed to explain more than 140 reports of unidentified flying objects-mostly because no one in government tried all that hard to explain them-Congress is set to approve legislation to create a new office within the Pentagon tasked with investigating military UFO sightings.
![Skype updates](https://loka.nahovitsyn.com/93.jpg)